EDITORIAL
Sound trickster...
A lot of the time, seeing the monster is not the scary part; it's not seeing it, but knowing it's there." In "A House of Dynamite," the unseen monster that we know is there is a missile hurtling toward Chicago. Paul N. J. Ottosson admits to manipulating the viewer in subtle ways to keep ratcheting up the sense of unease throughout the film's running time. For the background sound, he spent three days recording group voices —"We start out in the normal world, with a lot of 'blah, blah, blah, how are your kids doing?' Then we got into a phase where it's a lot of information." Once that information starts coming quickly at the audience, Ottosson manipulates it to keep the viewer on edge, purposely obscuring certain lines so that we become tense with worry over what we're missing. By making the dialogue more cacophonous as the pressure mounts, Ottosson replicates the feelings of the characters, who have trained hundreds of times for various scenarios — but are now experiencing something that goes beyond their typical exercises...
Have a pleasant Friday night at the movies,
Jean Constant
RECENT REVIEWSRead Jean Constant informal film, stream, and TV reviews on LetterboxdThis week update: The lost bus (2025) ⭐⭐⭐, The Rainmaker. (2025) TV series ⭐⭐⭐, Tron: Ares. (2025) ⭐⭐ * Wikipedia defines letterboxing as the practice of transferring film shot in a widescreen aspect ratio to standard-width video formats while preserving the original aspect ratio. Generally this is accomplished by adding mattes (or ‘black bars’) above and below the picture area. Letterboxd - the site is a global social network for grass-roots film discussion and discovery... |


Acclaimed filmmaker Shekhar Kapur delivered a stark warning to Hollywood studios and tech giants at WAVES Film Bazaar, declaring that artificial intelligence will trigger the collapse of traditional entertainment industry hierarchies and predicting that major corporations built on high entry barriers may not survive the transition. The director argued that AI drastically lowers entry barriers to filmmaking. "The best thing about AI is it's the most democratic technology. There is a $300 million film that can now be made in $300,000. If it's India, it can be made in $30,000," he said. Kapur predicted that major studios and large corporations will face collapse as AI democratizes content creation. He pointed to practical limitations already constraining traditional cinema: "In India, we have only 8,000 working screens. We keep talking about India as the greatest filmmaking nation in the world, but we have only 8,000 screens," he noted, adding that similar constraints exist in the U.K. and the U.S...